A condensed version of this post appeared on Equestria Daily on 30 July 2019, as part of Pony Community Soapbox #148.
There is a slice of this community that really, really dislikes the use of ponyisms outside a strictly Equestrian context. By this I mean things like saying "everypony" or "on the other hoof" when talking to other fans. I'll nail my colours to the mast right now and say that I don't really understand what the fuss is about. Actually, I'd go further: I think it's an actively
good thing for people to use these terms –
provided they keep them within the fandom.
A while back, former IDW comic artist Ben Bates posted in the EQD comments. He started his post with "Hello, everypony!" and was almost instantly shot down by another commenter with "Please don't do that." Why on earth not? The chances of people taking part in an EQD discussion, many of whom use pony avatars, usernames and so on, not understanding the term are pretty much zero. What harm does it do anyone if Mr Bates wants to be a little silly to a brony audience?
I used the word "brony" just now, and that's a term a large chunk of fans don't use, for a variety of reasons. I don't, much, although I don't have a problem with making exceptions when it's simply a convenient shorthand, such as in the blog description down there. Mind you, it doesn't get the vitriol poured over it that does "pegasister" – a very silly word, sure, but one that some female fans even now prefer. And why shouldn't they?
Another, much smaller, fandom of mine is that for
Watership Down. One of the Lapine words invented by Richard Adams is "hraka", meaning "droppings" and used by rabbits as a moderate swearword. Guess what? I use it myself. In real life. Not in front of people who I'd have to explain it to, but when I'm on my own and drop something on my foot? Sure. It's actually quite a satisfying word to growl out in those circumstances.
There
are a few ponyisms that I can't really see being used in the way that they are on the show. The infamous "flying feather" (though a term with only a single canon appearance) is one: its clear meaning is too strong to be used casually, yet the term is clearly too silly to be used in a genuinely heated argument. If someone did so, I'd probably suspect they were winding me up and that they weren't really that angry at all.
Nor am I really too keen on "bucking" being used to curse in public, since it just sounds too close to the word it rhymes with. On the other hoof, I'm really not sure why the very sight of the word
in a story winds some people up to an almost hilarious degree. I don't use it myself, but I can take it in some kinds of fic. Sure, it's silly, but really: is it any sillier than "everypony" or indeed some of the canon ponies' actual names? Nope.
Silliness in the fandom is
fundamentally good. Look: we are (mostly) adult fans of a kids' cartoon which exists to sell plastic toys and which centres on a bunch of multicoloured talking horses. There is
no way to be such a thing and
not be silly. I would suggest that it's far better to embrace the silliness than to try to somehow stand above the fray, and that being too irritated about it is actually worse than overdoing it a little...
...with one important caveat. I
don't like it when people carry this sort of thing outside the fandom and start using these terms to non-fans. That's just impolite, and risks making it sound as though you're affecting an air of superiority just because you're a brony. This is not really any better than when furries refer to non-furries as "mundanes". Keep the fandom vocabulary within the fandom, people.
But for Celestia's sake, let's not get het up about people sprinkling a few ponyisms into their conversation when simply chatting to other
MLP fans. It's not only harmless, it's actually a
good thing. If you can't deal with someone saying "Morning, fillies and gentlecolts" without getting annoyed, then maybe the one taking the fandom too seriously isn't the speaker. Maybe it's you.